THE PLIGHT, ESSENCE AND WAY OUT OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF CHINA’S INTER-REGIONAL PRIVATE LAW DISPUTES:FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL INTEREST COORDINATION  

中国区际私法争端司法解决的困境、实质及出路:以法律利益协调为视角（英文）

作　　者：Li Yiming Yi Zaicheng 李一鸣;易在成;Zhang Qing(Theoretical Economics Postdoctoral Workstation in Shenzhen University;Law School and Intellectual Property College of Shenzhen University;School of Law of Macao University of Science and Technology;不详)

机构地区：[1]Theoretical Economics Postdoctoral Workstation in Shenzhen University [2]Law School and Intellectual Property College of Shenzhen University [3]School of Law of Macao University of Science and Technology [4]不详

出　　处：《China Legal Science》2019年第3期96-116,共21页中国法学（英文版）

基　　金：sponsored by the Macao Foundation Research Project,entitled Cross-regional Legal Coordination and Cooperation:A Study Centered on Greater China(Grant No.0323)

摘　　要：Cross-strait Four Regions in Greater China belong to different jurisdictions. In the process of judicial settlement of private lew disputes between the four jurisdictions, there are legal difficulties in jurisdiction, application of law and the recognition and enforcement of court decisions. Although the internal laws of the four jurisdictions and the cross- jurisdictional bilateral agreements provide rules for the settlement of these conflicts of laws, there are no systematic and comprehensive provisions in the four jurisdictions. In other words, neither the existing unilateral rules in the four jurisdictions nor resolving inter-regional private law conflicts by reference to the rules of 'private international law could reflect the particularity of Chinas inter-regional private law. Behind such dilemma are conflicts of legal interests, since these jurisdictions solely focus on unilateral legal interests when drafting legal rules, or pursue superficial convergence of conflict rules, we cannot fundamentally resolve the dilemma in the judicial settlement of Chinas inter-regional private /mv disputes. In order to get out of the plight in the judicial settlement of inter-regional private law disputes in China, these jurisdictions should take the coordination of legal interests as the starting point and purpose, from soliloquy to negotiation, from independence to equal respect and communication, establishing a good communication mechanism among jurisdictions, courts, legislators and the parties concerned.大中华区下两岸四地分属四个不同法域。在四个法域间解决私法争端存在着诸多法律上的困境,如管辖权、法律适用与法院判决的认可执行等。虽然四个法域之域内法及跨域之双边协议对法域间私法争端的解决有所规定,但这些规定或为单方面规则,或参照国际私法之规则,都没有体现出中国区际私法的特殊性。中国区际私法争端司法解决应以法律利益协调为出发点,建立法域之间、法院之间、立法者及利益相关者之间良好的沟通机制。从而实现从独白走向商谈,从独行其事到平等尊重与交往。

关 键 词：区际私法 法律适用 司法解决 利益协调 中国 法院判决 利益相关者 两岸四地 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]