检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何洁 He Jie(Shihezi, Xinjiang 832006, China)
机构地区:[1]石河子大学第一附属医院急诊外科,新疆石河子832006
出 处:《医药前沿》2019年第13期186-187,共2页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
摘 要:目的:对多发伤并重型颅脑损伤患者中应用不同急救护理模式的效果进行探讨。方法:选择收治多发伤并发重型颅脑损伤患者120例,按照随机数字表法分为实验组(n=60)和常规组(n=60)。常规组接受传统急救护理,实验组接受一体化急救护理,观察两组救治效果。结果:实验组院前急救时间、院内急救时间均显著短于常规组(P<0.05)。实验组转科前死亡率显著低于常规组,治愈率显著高于常规组(P<0.05)。结论:在多发伤并重型颅脑损伤患者中应用一体化救治模式效果显著,其能够有效提升救治成功率,值得进行广泛推广。Objective To investigate the effects of different emergency care modes in patients with multiple injuries and severe head injury Methods A total of 120 patients with multiple traumatic brain injury were enrolled. The patients were divided into experimental group (n=60) and routine group (n=60) according to the random number table method. The conventional group received traditional emergency care, and the experimental group received integrated emergency care to observe the effects of the two groups. Results The prehospital emergency time and in-hospital emergency time of the experimental group were significantly shorter than the conventional group (P<0.05). The mortality rate of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group, and the cure rate was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of integrated treatment mode in patients with multiple trauma and severe craniocerebral injury is effective, which can effectively improve the success rate of treatment and is worthy of widespread promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28