检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李俊阳[1] LI Jun-yang(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tongling Polytechnic, Tongling 244000, China)
机构地区:[1]铜陵职业技术学院机械工程系
出 处:《西安文理学院学报(自然科学版)》2019年第3期40-44,共5页Journal of Xi’an University(Natural Science Edition)
摘 要:在加工有椭圆形状零件时,采用何种编程方法提高编程效率是编程员较难定夺的问题.通过对椭圆标准方程和参数方程不同的处理方法进行比较,进而讨论直线逼近和圆弧逼近方法的不同,得出直线逼近比圆弧逼近高效,后者比前者精度有所提高的结论.When processing elliptical shape parts, it is difficult for programmers to decide which programming method should be adopted to improve programming efficiency. In this paper, two different methods of elliptic standard equation and parametric equation are compared, and then the difference between straight line approximation and circular arc approximation is discussed. It is concluded that straight line approximation is more efficient than circular arc approximation, and the accuracy of the latter is higher than that of the former.
关 键 词:R参数 宏程序 西门子802s/c 计算机辅助制造
分 类 号:TG659[金属学及工艺—金属切削加工及机床]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15