检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳钰杰
机构地区:[1]甘肃西苑勘察规划设计有限公司,甘肃庆阳745000
出 处:《中国建材科技》2019年第2期116-119,共4页China Building Materials Science & Technology
摘 要:黄土填方地区的利用一直以来颇受争议。以实际调查案例为基础,分析了原始加固方案的弊端。分别模拟分析了灰土挤密桩与砂石桩加固方案,从沉降趋势、应变分布、超静孔隙水压力分布、渗流量等几个方面系统分析了两个方案的加固效果。分析表明,两种加固方案均可满足沉降要求,砂石桩法排水更通畅,固结更迅速,工程实践中具体可根据地基内含水情形选用。The use of loess fill areas has been controversial.The disadvantages of the original reinforcement scheme are analyzed based on the actual investigation case. The lime-soil compacted piles and sand-gravel piles were simulated respectively.The reinforcement effects of the two schemes were systematically analyzed from several aspects such as settlement trend, strain distribution, excess pore water pressure distribution and seepage flow. The result shows that both kinds of schemes can meet the settlement requirements, the sand-gravel pile has faster drainage rate,the consolidation is more rapid.The engineering practice can be selected according to the water content in the foundation.
分 类 号:TU753.3[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.247.210