论新媒体环境下隐私收缩性保护与价值差序  

On Privacy Protection and Grade-based Value Assessment under New Media Environment

作　　者：陈堂发[1] CHEN Tanefa

机构地区：[1]南京大学新闻传播学院

出　　处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2019年第3期1-8,共8页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“互联网与表达权的法律边界研究”(15ZDB144)

摘　　要：生成于传统媒体环境下的宽泛隐私理念具有合理性、必然性,而仍然作为主流观点的泛化隐私理论是对隐私权客体的形式主义解释,即偏重概念的字面意义,其外延尽可能囊括所有“能指”与“所指”的理解。隐私法理基础的再认识是由于新媒体高度社会化条件下,判别“隐私自决”意志表现的复杂性、不确定性以及传统的隐私保护策略失效。基于隐私严格保护难以兑现的客观困境,体现隐私人格利益相对性则强调不同境遇下关涉隐私的价值冲突的差序权衡,即公认的重大或重要价值至上、约定义务的诚信价值优先、忠诚义务的价值酌定及无关人格尊严价值的个人信息去隐私化。Under traditional media environment the concept of privacy in its narrow sense is reasonable and inevitable,but this view on privacy,as the mainstream view,is just a formal interpretation of the object of privacy,that is to say,it is just the emphasis on the literal meaning of concept,an extension covering as much as possible the understanding of"signifier"and"denotation". Rerecognition to the privacy view is essential legal being due to the more complex and indefinite to distinguish the will of"privacy selfdetermination"and gradually failing to traditional strategy of privacy protection under the highly socialized condition of the new media. Based on the objective dilemma of privacy-protecting broadly,the relativity of privacy personality interests should be emphasized grade-based value assessment and the value conflicts related to privacy under different circumstances,that means the value which is recognized popularly to be important is at the highest level,and the value of honesty which belongs to contractual obligation should be prior to others,and the value of loyalty obligation will be considerate as appropriate,and finally the personal information that is not related to human dignity should exclude from privacy.

关 键 词：隐私利益 价值差序 隐私泛化 个人信息 伦理人格 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]