两种导尿方法在脊髓损伤患者中的应用效果比较  

Comparison of the Efficacy of two Catheterization Methods in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

作　　者：张竞 张艳艳[1] 王静[1] 张楠[1] 张叶 Zhang Jing;Zhang Yanyan;Wang Jing(Qilu Hospital of Shandong University,Jinan Shandong 250012,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学齐鲁医院

出　　处：《齐鲁护理杂志》2019年第10期22-24,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing

基　　金：山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(编号:2016WS0349)

摘　　要：目的:比较清洁间歇导尿法和留置导尿法在脊髓损伤患者中的应用效果。方法:将100例脊髓损伤致排尿障碍患者随机分为甲组和乙组各50例,甲组采用清洁间歇导尿法,乙组采用留置导尿法,比较两组临床效果。结果:两组患者尿路感染发生率、护理满意度以及干预后生活质量评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用清洁间歇导尿法能够降低脊髓损伤致排尿障碍患者的尿路感染发生率,提高护理满意度和生活质量。Objective:To compare the efficacy of clean intermittent catheterization and indwelling catheterization in patients with spinal cord injury.Methods:A total of 100 patients with urinary dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury were randomly divided into group A and group B.Group A was treated with clean intermittent catheterization and group B was treated with indwelling catheterization.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results:There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of urinary tract infection,nursing satisfaction and life quality score after intervention(P<0.05).Conclusion:The use of clean intermittent catheterization can reduce the incidence of urinary tract infection in patients with urinary dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury,and improve nursing satisfaction and quality of life.

关 键 词：清洁间歇导尿 导尿管 尿路感染 生活质量 

分 类 号：R473.6[医药卫生—护理学]