检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐月华 Xu Yuehua
机构地区:[1]广东技术师范大学图书馆
出 处:《大学图书馆学报》2019年第3期35-42,49,共9页Journal of Academic Libraries
摘 要:基于2011~2016年广东省政府采购网图书采购招标和中标公告数据,系统分析了当前图书招标采购现状及发展态势。研究发现,招标采购已成为各级各类型图书馆图书采购的主要方式,并伴随图书采购需求和庞大的市场规模持续增长和普及。馆配市场也形成了由大型知名图书供应商占据绝对主体地位的市场格局。图书馆图书采购自主权的缺失和弱化导致最低价中标现象愈演愈烈,图书供应商"良币自我劣化"式竞争导致图书折扣率不断下探,供需两侧都深陷最低价中标困境。研究认为,走出最低价中标困境,需要在需求和供给两端同时着手修订招标法规政策,重在给予图书馆更多采购自主权,同时辅以给予投标人最低报价的必要限制。Based on the Bidding and Bid Announcement Data of the Guangdong Provincial Government Procurement Network from 2011 to 2016,the status quo and development trend of book bidding and procurement were systematically analyzed.It is found that tendering and procurement have become the main method of library procurement for all types of libraries at all levels.Along with the continuous increase in the demand for book purchases and a huge market,the library and distribution market has also formed a market pattern dominated by large-scale well-known book suppliers.The absence and weakening of library book purchasing autonomy have led to a sharpening of the lowest bid winning phenomenon.Book suppliers’"good money self-deteriorating"type competition has led to a continuous decline in book discount rates.Both supply and demand have fallen into the dilemma of winning the lowest bid.The study believes that going out of the dilemma of winning the lowest price needs to simultaneously revise the regulations and policies on bidding at both ends of demand and supply,focusing on giving the library more autonomy in procurement,supplemented by the necessary restrictions on giving bidders a minimum quotation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.186.192