检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕燕芬[1] 孙月[1] 李云燕[1] 赵易凡 陆永萍[1] LV Yan-fen;SUN Yue;LI Yun-yan;ZHAO Yi-fan;LU Yong-ping(Dept. of Ultrasound,The 2nd People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province,Kunming Yunnan 650021,China)
机构地区:[1]云南省第二人民医院超声科
出 处:《昆明医科大学学报》2019年第6期80-84,共5页Journal of Kunming Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81660084);云南省医学领军人才培养项目(L-201616)
摘 要:目的 评价超微血流成像(SMI)联合剪切波弹性成像(SWE)鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值。方法 对96例共115个可疑甲状腺结节进行SMI和SWE检查,以病理结果为依据评估SMI、SWE及SMI联合SWE诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值。结果 115个甲状腺结节中,良性结节44个,恶性结节71个。SMI的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为87.32%、77.27%、83.48%、86.11%及79.07%;SWE的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为85.92%、68.18%、79.13%、81.33%及75.0%;SMI联合SWE的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值分别为91.55%、93.19%、92.17%、95.59%及87.23%。结论 SMI联合SWE对甲状腺结节良恶性有较高的鉴别诊断价值,两者结合可以提高诊断的特异度和准确度。Objective To evaluate the value of superb microvacular imaging (SMI) combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods SMI and SWE examinations were performed on 115 suspicious thyroid nodules in 96 cases. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of SMI, SWE and SMI combined with SWE in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules were evaluated based on pathological results. Results Of the 115 thyroid nodules,44 were benign nodules and 71 were malignant nodules. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of SMI were 87.32%, 77.27%, 83.48%, 86.11% and 79.07% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of SMI combined with SWE were 91.55%,93.19%,92.17%, 95.59% and 87.23% respectively.Conclusions SWE combined with SMI have high value in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, and the combination of them can improve the specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis for thyroid nodules. The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of SWE were 85.92%, 68.18%, 79.13%, 81.33% and 75.0% respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28