现有技术抗辩的适用——朱豹诉北京居然之家公司等侵犯实用新型专利案  

On the Application of the Prior-Art Defense

作　　者：管荣齐[1] GUAN Rongqi(Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072)

机构地区：[1]天津大学

出　　处：《中国发明与专利》2019年第6期114-118,共5页China Invention & Patent

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划项目“京津冀知识产权保护一体化研究”(项目编号:TJFX18-004);天津市科技发展战略研究计划项目“新时代科技创新重大成果知识产权优先保护机制研究”(项目编号:18ZLZXZF00180)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：现有技术抗辩的适用范围已经从专利等同侵权扩展至专利相同侵权,以充分发挥其便捷、低廉且能避开专利诉讼和行政确权程序纠葛的优势。现有技术抗辩的适用前提是认定被诉侵权行为构成专利侵权,以确定被诉侵权技术方案落入涉案专利保护范围的全部技术特征。现有技术抗辩的适用对象不能是两项及以上现有技术的组合,否则严重偏离其制度本意和丧失其比较优势。The application scope of the prior-art defense has been extended from patent equivalent infringement to patent identical infringement, so as to give full play to its advantages of convenience, low cost and avoiding the entanglement of patent litigation and administrative confirmation procedure. The application premise of the prior-art defense is that the defendant's infringement act constitutes patent infringement, so as to determine all the technical characteristics of the technical proposal of defendant infringement falling into the scope of patent protection in the case. The application object of the prior-art defense should not be the combination of two or more prior-arts, otherwise it would seriously deviate from its system intention and lose its comparative advantages.

关 键 词：现有技术抗辩 专利侵权 等同 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]