检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈丹[1] 杨春[2] Chen Dan;Yang Chun(Department of Neurology,People's Hospital of Jingmen,Jingmen 448000,China)
机构地区:[1]荆门市第一人民医院神经内科,湖北荆门448000 [2]荆门市第一人民医院护理部,湖北荆门448000
出 处:《护理学杂志》2019年第11期68-71,共4页Journal of Nursing Science
基 金:2018年荆门市一般科技项目(2018YFYB029)
摘 要:目的探讨尊严疗法干预在老年轻度认知障碍患者的应用效果。方法采用便利抽样法,选取92例老年轻度认知障碍患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为干预组和对照组各46例,对照组实施常规护理,干预组实施尊严疗法干预。干预前及干预后2周使用患者尊严量表、医院焦虑抑郁量表、蒙特利尔认知评估量评估效果。结果干预组干预后的尊严及认知功能得分显著优于对照组,焦虑、抑郁得分显著低于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论尊严疗法干预可降低老年轻度认知障碍患者尊严受损程度,减轻其焦虑抑郁情绪,提高其认知能力。Objective To explore the effect of dignity therapy on patients with mild cognitive impairment(MCI).Methods By conve-nience sampling method, 92 MCI patients were selected and evenly randomized into 2 groups :the control group received routine care, while the intervention group received dignity therapy.Patients were measured with the Patient Dignity Inventory(PDI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS), and the Montreal-Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) scale at baseline, and 2 weeks into the intervention.Results After the intervention, the intervention group had higher dignity and cognitive scores, and lower an-xiety and depression scores, than the controls(P<0.05,P<0.01).Conclusion Dignity therapy could reduce the degree of dignity damage, anxiety and depression levels in MCI patients, and improve their cognitive function.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28