文义解释的反思与语用学转向——以指导性案例6号为引论  

Reflection on Literary Interpretation and Pragmatic Turn ——Introduction to Guiding Case No.6

作　　者：洪洋 Hong Yang(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法律硕士教育中心

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2019年第2期141-148,共8页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：进行文义解释得出的解释结论必须是法律规范的字面含义,与惯常的使用方式相协调,符合通常的逻辑意义,不能恣意扩大法律规范的外延,超过可能的文义。文义解释在司法实践中弊端日显,根据语义进行纯粹的机械性解释在一定程度上会得出与立法目的、社会认知不相一致的结论。如何在司法实践中拔出“语义学之刺”,促使文义解释从语义解释的角度向语用解释的方向发展,注重静态的文义与动态的语境之间的交互涵摄,在语义的基础上充分发挥语用的功效,实现以语义回应语用、以语用加深语义这一文义解释的理想目标,是进行文义解释必须重点关注的内容。The interpretation conclusion from literal interpretation must be the literal meaning of legal norms,coordinated with the usual usage,conform to the usual logical meaning,and can not arbitrarily expand the extension of legal norms beyond the possible literal meaning.In judicial practice,the disadvantages of literal interpretation are becoming more and more obvious.It is possible to draw a conclusion that the static and single mechanical interpretation based on literal interpretation is inconsistent with legislative purpose and social cognition.How to get rid of the “thorn of semantics” in judicial practice,promote the development of literary interpretation from the perspective of semantic interpretation to the direction of pragmatic interpretation,pay attention to the interaction between static meaning and dynamic situation,give full play to the function of pragmatics on the basis of semantics,and realize the ideal goal of semantic response to Pragmatics and deepening semantics by pragmatics is to carry out literary interpretation.The content that must be paid attention to in interpretation.

关 键 词：文义解释 语义学 语用学 转向 

分 类 号：D90-05[政治法律—法学理论]