检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宗晓华[1] 郝笑影 Zong Xiaohua;Hao Xiaoying
机构地区:[1]南京大学教育研究院
出 处:《江苏高教》2019年第6期112-118,共7页Jiangsu Higher Education
基 金:国家社科基金教育学一般课题“‘双一流’建设大学科研绩效评价与拨款机制研究”(BFA180066)
摘 要:英国大学的科研竞争力在国际上一直遥遥领先,这与其不断创新的大学科研绩效评价与拨款制度密切相关。基于知识创新范式的转型与绩效评估自身面临的困境,英国在最新的一轮评估中引入科研卓越框架(REF)。相比于之前的科研水平评估(RAE),科研卓越框架在指标体系上增加科研影响力维度,突出大学科研对社会经济的贡献导向;在评估单元设置上大幅度地合并划分过细的学科,缩减学科单元总量,鼓励跨学科研究;在基于绩效评价结果的拨款上倾斜程度更加明显,拨款机制也更为透明。本轮英国大学科研绩效评估与绩效拨款改革与创新,对于中国"双一流"建设绩效评价和绩效拨款具有重要启示。UK universities has always led the world in the research competitiveness, which is closely related to their continuous innovations in research performance assessment and funding system. Based on the transformation of knowledge innovation paradigm and the dilemma faced by performance assessment, UK has introduced the Research Excellence Framework(REF) in the latest round of evaluation. Compared with the previous Research Assessment Exercise(RAE), REF 2014 introduced the research impact indicators to highlight the contribution orientation of university research for society and economy. In terms of the setting of the units of assessment(UOAs), subjects which were divided too finely are merged, the total number of subject units is cut down, and measures to support interdisciplinary research are encouraged. It is more obvious that research funding allocation inclines heavily towards high level performance and funding mechanisms are more transparent. In the context of "Double-First Class" initiative, the reform and innovation of research performance assessment and funding in UK will be of great enlightenment to research performance evaluation and funding in China.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.36.23