检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申艳泉 Shen Yanquan(Guilin Women's and Children's Hospital 541001)
机构地区:[1]桂林市妇女儿童医院
出 处:《中国社区医师》2019年第16期65-65,67,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:研究分析对黄疸患儿施予间隙与持续蓝光光疗的价值及效果。方法:收治病理性黄疸患儿102例,接受持续蓝光光疗的51例作为A组,接受间隙蓝光光疗的51例作为B组。观察比较结果。结果:B组患儿胆红素水平、不良反应的发生率、治疗疗效优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:间隙蓝光光疗在新生儿病理性黄疸的治疗中优于持续实施光疗,能减少患者各类不良反应的产生。Objective:To analyze the effect of interval and continuous blue light therapy in neonatal jaundice.Methods:102 neonates with pathological jaundice were selected,51 cases received continuous blue light therapy were selected as the group A, and 51 cases received interstitial blue light therapy as the group B,we observed and compared the results.Results:The decrease of bilirubin,the incidence of adverse reactions and the therapeutic effect of the group B were better than those of the group A,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Interval therapy is more effective than continuous therapy for neonatal pathological jaundice with lower adverse reactions,which can reduce the occurrence of various adverse reactions in patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63