检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵阳[1] 游骏[1] ZHAO Yang;YOU Jun(National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China)
机构地区:[1]国防科技大学,湖南长沙410073
出 处:《国防科技》2019年第2期50-53,共4页National Defense Technology
摘 要:建立第三方论证评估机制是现代决策制度的普遍做法,也是确保军队相关制度政策科学有效的必然选择。军队建立第三方论证评估机制,要从建立基于第三方军队政策论证评估体系、第三方论证评估机构资质等级制度、第三方论证评估服务专项采购制度、第三方论证评估机构行业管理机制、第三方论证评估信息保障机制、军队智库长效发展机制等方面重点展开,进而形成比较完善的第三方论证评估制度体系,推动军队治理体系现代化建设。Establishing the third-party argumentation and evaluation mechanism is a common practice of modern decision-making system,and also an inevitable choice to ensure the scientific and effective policies of the relevant military systems.The establishment of the third-party argumentation and evaluation mechanism in the army should focus on the establishment of the third-party argumentation and evaluation system,the qualification rating system of the third-party argumentation and evaluation institution,the special procurement system of the third-party argumentation and evaluation service,the industry management mechanism of the third-party argumentation and evaluation institution,the information guarantee mechanism of the third-party argumentation and evaluation,and the long-term development mechanism of the military think tank,and then a relatively perfect third-party argumentation and evaluation system will promote the modernization of the military governance system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7