检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程乐 蔡广强[2,3] 张金松 黄河洵[2] 刘嘉祺 CHENG Le;CAI Guang-qiang;ZHANG Jin-song;HUANG He-xun;LIU Jia-qi(College of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006 , China;Shenzhen WaterAffairs < Group > Co. Ltd., Shenzhen 518031 , China;Key Laboratory of Water Resource Utilizationand Environmental Pollution Control in Shenzhen, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology < Shenzhen > , Shenzhen 518055 , China)
机构地区:[1]广州大学土木工程学院,广东广州510006 [2]深圳市水务<集团>有限公司,广东深圳518031 [3]哈尔滨工业大学<深圳〉土木与环境工程学院深圳市水资源利用与环境污染控制重点实验室,广东深圳518055
出 处:《中国给水排水》2019年第9期36-41,共6页China Water & Wastewater
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2015ZX07406-004)
摘 要:为了提高饮用水水质安全保障水平,分别以三氯乙醛(CH)水溶液和南方某水库水为研究对象,考察了木质、煤质和椰壳等3种粉末活性炭(PAC)对CH及其前体物的控制效果,并采用三维荧光光谱(3D-EEM)对水中的溶解性有机物(DOM)进行表征。结果表明,3种PAC对CH均有良好吸附作用,最优投加量为60mg/L,去除率分别为77.46%、7&22%和81.36%;3种PAC在反应初期(0-0.25h)对CH的吸附速率最快,吸附1.0h后PAC吸附趋于饱和状态;椰壳PAC对CH前体物的去除效果稍优于木质和煤质PAC,最优投加量为30mg/L,此时去除率为61.39%,而木质和煤质PAC最优投加量均为50mg/L,相应的去除率分别为62.22%和5&06%。3D-EEM分析显示.PAC主要通过吸附水中的芳香性蛋白质类有机物和微生物代谢产物来控制三氯乙醛生成势(CHFP).In order to improve the quality safety guarantee level of drinking water, removal of chloral hydrate ( CH) and its precursors by the powdered activated carbon ( PAC ) of wood, coal and coconut shell were studied for CH aqueous solution and water from a southern reservoir, and the dissolved organic matter ( DOM ) in the water was characterized by three?dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy (3D-EEM). The results showed that all three kinds of PAC had good adsorption effect on CH, and the optimal dosage was 60 mg/L, with removal rates of 77.46%, 78. 22% and 81.36%, respectively. The adsorption rate of the three kinds of PAC to CH was the fastest at the initial stage of adsorption reaction (0 -0. 25h), and PAC adsorption tended to be saturated after the adsorption reaction time reached 1.0 h. In addition, the removal effect of coconut shell PAC on CH precursors was slightly better than that of wood and coal PAC , and the removal rate reached 61.39% under the dosage of 30 mg/L. While the optimal dosage of wood and coal PAC was 50 mg/L, the removal rates were 62. 22% and 58. 06% respectively. Moreover, 3D-EEM analysis indicated that why chloral hydrate formation potential( CHFP) was controlled by PAC adsoiption was the removal of aromatic protein and microbial product in the water.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7