“中国式”市场监管:逻辑起点、理论观点和研究重点  

Market Regulation in China: Starting Point, Key Issues and Research Subjects

作　　者：胡颖廉[1] Hu Yinglian(Department of Social & Ecological Studies, Party School of the Central Committee of C.P.C (National Academy of Governance),Beijing 100089)

机构地区：[1]中央党校(国家行政学院)社会和生态文明教研部

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2019年第5期22-28,共7页Chinese Public Administration

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国特色的政府监管理论本土化及其应用”(18ZDA112)

摘　　要：发达国家监管体系构建在相对成熟的市场和社会基础上,监管是市场机制的补充。与此不同,中国经历了从计划经济向市场监管的反向制度演进,因此塑造了行政吸纳市场、剩余监管权和非自主性社会共治的独特格局。以此为逻辑起点,分析"中国式"市场监管的内在机理,并形成若干基本理论观点。监管能力约束下的"政府背书式"审批导致产业基础系统性薄弱,过度管控的事中事后监管扭曲了正常市场竞争,监管事权下沉和运动整治未能构建起风险化解的长效机制。针对上述挑战,本土化市场监管研究应致力于从宏观、中观、微观三个层次回应亟待研究的重点领域和主题,具体包括科学监管和监管现代化、监管体系基本架构、监管机构和市场主体行为等。The essence of regulation is a complement to market failure, and western style regulatory state usually starts with free market and civil society. The institutional transition of regulation in China experiences a quite opposite direction from a planned economy to a regulated market, shaping a unique structure among various elements,including administrative absorption market,residual regulation and non-autonomous social governance. Based on this starting point, the issues about Chinese style regulation mechanism are argued. First, a weak industry turns out due to the government endorsement certification under regulatory capacity constraint. Second, overregulation distorts competition and amplifies potential risk in the marketplace. Finally, residual regulation and campaign style administration lead to a poor regulatory performance. Three levels of research projects are advocated in order to cope with these challenges, including scientific regulation and regulatory modernization,structure of regulatory system, as well as regulatory institution and policy.

关 键 词：市场监管 政府和市场关系 科学监管 行政体制改革 国家治理现代化 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]