风险社会与危机治理理论的限度及其辩证思考——兼评《邻比冲突及其治理模式研究》对制度创新理论的贡献  

The Boundary of Risk Society and Its Innovation for Crisis Governance——The Contribution of NIMBY Conflict and Its Governance Models to Institutional Innovation Theory

作　　者：高小平[1] Gao Xiaoping(Research Fellow at Chinese Public Administration Society,Beijing 100017)

机构地区：[1]中国行政管理学会

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2019年第5期124-130,共7页Chinese Public Administration

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“国家治理现代化与行政管理制度体系创新研究”(编号:17ZDA105)

摘　　要：风险社会理论是理解当今诸多社会问题的一把钥匙。但是不能任意扩大风险社会理论的应用范围,在和平与发展仍然是国际社会主题的情况下,需要对风险社会的"边界"进行划定,以防止产生夸大风险的"新风险"。在一个充满风险与危机的社会中,要正确地分析风险与危机之间的关系,看到风险社会的另一面--正常社会,坚持社会主要矛盾的理论,坚持以改革和发展的态度对待风险与冲突,并致力于风险治理与危机治理制度的创新。陈宝胜教授的专著《邻比冲突及其治理模式研究》在这方面做了开创性研究。Risk society theory is a key to understanding many problems of modern society. The scope of application of risk society theory cannot be arbitrarily exaggerated. In the contextual of peace and development being still the theme of international community, we need to definite the "boundary" of risk society to prevent "new risk" from over exaggerated risks. In a society that full of risks and crises, we need to analyze the relationship between risks and crises correctly so as to re-find a "normal society", which is the other side of the risk society, and commit to the institutional innovation for risk governance and crisis governance adhering to the Major Social Contradiction Theory and from the perspective of reform and development. NIMBY Conflict and Its Governance Models of Professor Chen Baosheng has made a groundbreaking study for that.

关 键 词：风险社会 邻比冲突 危机治理 制度创新 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]