中、欧、美岩土勘察布置的比较  

Contrast among Chinese, European and American standards for planning of geotechnical investigation

作　　者：万中喜[1] 任世锋 祁丽华[1] WAN Zhong-xi;REN Shi-feng;QI Li-hua(CCCC Water Transportation ConsultantsCo.,Ltd.,Beijing 100007,China)

机构地区：[1]中交水运规划设计院有限公司

出　　处：《水运工程》2019年第6期158-162,179,共6页Port & Waterway Engineering

摘　　要：针对中外标准有关岩土勘察布置要求的差异化问题,进行了中标(GB 50021-2001《岩土工程勘察规范》、JTS133-2013《水运工程岩土勘察规范》)、欧标(Eurocode 7《岩土工程设计规范》)和美标(《ASTM岩土勘察类标准》)有关岩土勘察布置要求的对比分析研究。研究发现,中外勘察标准在阶段划分、内容、方法、勘探点间距与深度、试验数量、勘察过程中的优化、施工阶段控制与监测等各个环节均存在明显差异,并在此基础上提出了海外勘察标准应用要点。这些研究成果有助于行业同仁对海外勘察标准的了解和使用,也利于中国勘察标准的国际接轨。In view of the differences of planning of geotechnical investigation requirements between Chinese and foreign standards,comparative analysis and research on planning of geotechnical investigation requirements of Chinese standard (GB 50021-2001 Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering,JTS 133-2013 Code for Geotechnical Investigation on Port and Waterway Engineering),European standard (Eurocode 7:Geotechnical design) and American standard (ASTM codes related to geotechnical investigation) were carried out.The study found that there were significant differences between the Chinese and foreign survey standards in terms of stage division,content,method,spacing and depth of exploration points,number of trials,optimization during surveying,control and monitoring of construction phases,and other aspects of the planning of investigation.We put forward the application points of overseas geotechnical investigation standards,which will help industry colleagues understand and use overseas investigation standards,and be beneficial to the international integration of Chinese standards.

关 键 词：中标GB 中标JTS 欧标Eurocode7 美标ASTM 岩土勘察布置 

分 类 号：TU44[建筑科学—岩土工程] U6[建筑科学—土工工程]