《海安考古录》版本略论  

Study on the Editions of Hai’an Archaeological Record

作　　者：丁富生[1] 徐燕[1] DING Fu-sheng;XU Yan(School of Chinese Language and Literature, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)

机构地区：[1]南通大学文学院

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期113-119,共7页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金重点项目“《海陵丛刻》整理与研究”(15ZWA001);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目“韩国钧著述研究”(2018SJA1195);南通市社会科学基金项目“王叶衢《海安考古录》‘原本’考及其中海安形象研究”(2018BNT026)

摘　　要：由清人王叶衢编著的《海安考古录》,是民国以前唯一一部记载海安地域综合历史的著作,于海安地域文明史贡献重大。今知有石麟画馆本和常熟丁祖荫校订本两个版本,在书名、卷目、内容方面均有差异,各有特点。石麟画馆本定本最早,征史可信,图文配合;丁校本编次完善,以文补史,文简事繁,辨订讹误。导致差异的原因,在于《海安考古录》从成书到刊行,时隔几十年,一直处于不断增删改订的状态。研治海安地域历史,两个版本不可偏废。Hai’an Archaeological Record is the only works composed before the Republic of China, recording the comprehensive history of Hai’an region and marking great contribution to the regional civilization of Hai’an. It is learned that there are two editions, one is the edition of Shi Lin gallery, and the other is the revised edition of Changshu Ding Zuyin. They are different in the title, volume and content and enjoy own uniqueness. The edition of Shi Lin gallery is completed earlier, can be confirmed in the historical records, and is complemented by pictures. The order of Ding’s edition is complete, added with more literature, which is characterized by the plain wording, the rich content and the accurate record. The cause of the difference lies in the fact that from the completion to the publication, it takes decades. During this time, Hai’an Archaeological Record has been in a constant revise . It must be pointed out that equal emphasis should be laid on the two editions in studying the regional history of Hai’an.

关 键 词：石麟画馆本 丁祖荫校订本 原稿本 

分 类 号：G256.22[文化科学—图书馆学]