检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方海峰 马金秋[3] 陈轶嵩 Fang Haifeng;Ma Jinqiu;Chen Yisong(Tianjin University,Tianjin 300192;China Automotive Technology Research Center Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300300;Chang'an University,Shaanxi Xi'an 710064)
机构地区:[1]天津大学,天津300192 [2]中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司,天津300300 [3]长安大学,陕西西安710064
出 处:《汽车实用技术》2019年第12期27-30,共4页Automobile Applied Technology
摘 要:目前,针对车辆的节能环保绩效越来越受到广泛重视,各类替代能源汽车出现以期缓和化石能源危机与环境污染压力。对于中型货车而言,多种能源技术路线已逐步推广,但哪种技术路线具有最好的环保效益还需要一系列研究来确定。在此背景下,文章应用生命周期评价方法(LCA),选取较为常见的7款不同类别能源中型货车为研究对象,基于Gabi平台建立计算模型,并将最终的输出环境影响结果进行了对比分析。结果表明,综合环境效益最优的为燃料电池中型货车,并提出优化电网结构与制氢方案、加强汽车绿色设计等建议,以期进一步提升中型货车的环保效益。At present, the energy conservation and environmental protection performance of vehicles has been paid more and more attention. Various types of alternative energy vehicles have emerged to ease the pressure of fossil energy and environ -mental pollution. For medium-sized trucks, multiple energy technology routes have been gradually promoted, but the technical route with the best environmental benefits also needs a series of studies to determine. In this context, this paper applies the life cycle assessment method (LCA) to select seven different types of energy medium-sized trucks as the research objects, builds a calculation model based on the Gabi platform, and compares the final output environmental impact results. The results show that the fuel cell medium-sized trucks with the best environmental benefits and suggest optimizing the grid structure and hydrogen production scheme and strengthening the green design of the vehicle, in order to improve the environ -mental benefits of the medium-sized trucks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46