中国内国法下专属经济区海事诉讼管辖权的正当性分析  

Analysis of the legitimacy of China’s domestic law on judicial jurisdiction over marine affairs in EEZ

作　　者：侯初晨 HOU Chu-chen(School of Law,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2019年第2期34-52,共19页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

摘　　要：近年来中国司法实践不断扩大在专属经济区的海事诉讼管辖权,与之相关的管辖权行使正当性问题也随之产生。以中国内国法关于专属经济区海事诉讼管辖权的规定为研究重点,首先梳理了《联合国海洋法公约》和国际习惯法对专属经济区海事诉讼管辖权的相关规定,将中国在专属经济区享有的海事诉讼管辖权划分为两类,一类是主权权利和管辖权范围内的海事诉讼管辖权,另一类是尚待分配的权利范围内的海事诉讼管辖权;其次,在上述两类范围内分别讨论中国内国法的具体规定,通过对比中国参加的国际公约指出内国法存在的正当性问题;最后针对中国内国法存在的正当性问题提出解决方案。China’s judicial practice in exercising jurisdiction over marine affairs in the exclusive economic zones (EEZ) has witnessed a continuing expansion in recent years, and the legitimacy of such jurisdiction is thus put on question. This paper sets to discuss this issue, with emphasis on the Chinese domestic provisions on the judicial jurisdiction over marine affairs in the EEZ. First, the paper analyzes the relevant provisions on the judicial jurisdiction over marine affairs in the EEZ under the UNCLOS and the related customary international law. The judicial jurisdiction can be divided into two categories, one is the judicial jurisdiction of marine affairs allocated to coastal states, the other is those yet to be allocated to the coastal states. Then this paper discusses the specific provisions related to these two categories under the domestic law respectively, and pinpoints the legitimacy issues under the domestic law in comparison with the international conventions to which China is a party. Finally, this paper tries to propose some solutions related to the legitimacy issues found under the present domestic law of China.

关 键 词：专属经济区 海事诉讼管辖权 国际公约 内国法 

分 类 号：D993.5[政治法律—国际法学]