《青囊奥语》坤壬乙“巨门”“文曲”小考  

Investigation of the Book "Qing Nang Ao Yu" about whether Kun Ren Yi Comes From Ju Men or Wen Qu

作　　者：刘轶 Liu Yi

机构地区：[1]上海视觉艺术学院 [2]上海社科院文学所

出　　处：《上海视觉》2018年第1期31-35,共5页Shanghai Vision

摘　　要：题为杨筠松所著《青囊奥语》首句,今流传“坤壬乙巨门从头出”“坤壬乙文曲从头出”和“坤壬乙廉巨从头出”三种版本。有关学人对此已经争执多年,但囿于门户之争,乏见全面客观的考察。通过对相关文献的分析,可以发现今天流行的两个观点:蒋大鸿篡改说、张受祺篡改说,皆不可全信。较为肯定的是在明末和康乾之时,“文曲”“巨门”同时见于当时著作,但以“文曲”较多。蒋大鸿使用“巨门”以及《四库全书》本引用“巨门”之后,“巨门”的影响力逐步扩散,导致今日用“巨门”兼向挨星法较多。“廉巨”除端木国瑚用过之外,其余少见。《奥语》“坤壬乙”一诀因“文曲”“巨门”的不确定性,其解读方式显得更加复杂多元。The initial sentence of “Qing Nang Ao Yu”(written by Yang Junsong) has three versions nowadays, namely“Kun Ren Yi comes from Ju Men”,“Kun Ren Yi comes from Wen Qu” and “Kun Ren Yi comes from Lian Ju”. Scholars in the certain field have argued about which is the correct version for ages. However, because every scholar only speaks for his/her school, there is rarely a comprehensive and objective opinion. After analysis of related documents, we can find neither of the two popular opinions, revised by Jiang Dahong and revised by Zhang Shouqi, can be fully trusted. It is almost for sure that during the period of late Ming Dynasty and the Golden Age of Three Emperors, both “Wen Qu” and “Ju Men” appeared in the documents and “Wen Qu” was in the majority. After being used by Jiang Dahong and referred in The Four Categories, the version of“Ju Men” spread gradually, which leads to present more use of “Ju Men” for Star Prediction.“Lian Ju” was used by Duanmu Guohu, and apart from that, there is few records. Because it is not sure whether “Kun Ren Yi” comes from “Wen Qu” or “Ju Men”, the interpretation of the book can be varied from person to person.

关 键 词：青囊奥语 巨门 文曲 

分 类 号：J632.33[艺术—音乐]