检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘瑛[1] 刘正洋 LIU Ying;LIU Zhengyang
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院、国际法研究所
出 处:《武大国际法评论》2019年第3期139-157,共19页Wuhan University International Law Review
摘 要:2018年6月,美国在WTO体制外发起对中国的301调查并实施了相应制裁措施。对WTO规则和案例的分析表明,即便针对非涉WTO协定事项,301制裁仍将因WTO成员方诉权及DSB排他管辖权的启动而被拉回到多边体制中,从而有效限制301制裁在WTO体制外的适用空间。同时,301制裁在WTO体制外的适用仍受制于一般国际法。而此次美国对华301制裁措施不仅违反了其在WTO项下的义务,也构成了对一般国际法的违反。Through the investigation, USTR has enacted the unilateral sanction measures to China outside WTO system. Based on the analysis of WTO rules and the precedents, this article points out that though 301 sanction measures are applied to non-WTO-related affairs, the measures will still be hauled back into the multilateral system, due to the exertion of other WTO members’ recourses and the exclusive jurisdiction of DSB. Furthermore, when applied outside the WTO system, 301 sanction measures shall be regulated by general international law. The unilateral sanction measures taken by USA, have violated US’WTO obligations and general international law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.23