移植与限度:牵连犯教义学理论引入之反省  

Transplantation and Limitation: Reflection on Introduction of Doctrinal Theory of Implicated Crime

作　　者：路军[1] Lu Jun

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院

出　　处：《法学杂志》2019年第6期93-103,共11页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：在我国,牵连犯概念及从一重处罚原则的教义学理论移植面临法律根据为何及处罚原则妥当与否的双重诘问。教义学理论移植应该受到本土刑事立法的限制,并且应以妥当解决司法适用问题为导向。我国牵连犯教义学理论引入没有关照本土立法的现实,且司法适用方面也存在违反罪刑相适应原则的质疑,可以说是法教义学理论移植失败的范例。在牵连犯理论的原产地酝酿废弃相关立法、立法及理论移植地已删除牵连犯立法的背景下,本土刑法教义学应该考虑牵连犯理论的废弃问题。The concept of implicated offense and its transplant from the doctrinal theory of the principle of heavy punishment are confronted with the double questioning of what the legal basis is and whether the principle of punishment is appropriate or not. The transplant of doctrinal theory should be restricted by the local criminal legislation and should be oriented to properly solve the problem of judicial application. The introduction of doctrinal theory of implicated crime in China fails to take into account the reality of local legislation, and there are also challenges in judicial application that violate the principle of compatibility between crime and punishment, which is an example of failure in the transplantation of doctrinal theory of law. In the context of the origin of the theory of implicated offense brewing relevant legislation and the theory transplant place has deleted the legislation of implicated offense, the local doctrines of criminal law should consider the abandonment of the theory of implicated offense.

关 键 词：牵连犯 法律继受 概念移植 罪刑相适应原则 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]