马克思的形而上学批判及其辩证法道路  

Marx’s Metaphysical Criticism and Its Dialectical Path

作　　者：黄志军[1] Huang Zhijun(Institute of Marxism Studies, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学马克思主义理论研究所

出　　处：《教学与研究》2019年第6期15-21,共7页Teaching and Research

基　　金：北京市社科基金青年项目“政治经济学批判视域中人的存在方式研究”(项目号:18ZXC007);北京高校中国特色社会主义理论研究协同创新中心(首都师范大学)项目的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：关于马克思辩证法的形成问题,存在着两种基本的理解:一是唯物主义的进路,二是形而上学批判的进路。其中,对黑格尔辩证法的处理构成了这两种进路内在差异。唯物主义的进路突显了对唯心主义的颠倒,而忽视了对黑格尔辩证法合理内核的吸收与批判,所以很难解释唯物辩证法的完整建构。而马克思对政治经济学的形而上学批判的进路是在新唯物主义的基础上,通过充分吸收黑格尔辩证法来批判这种形而上学,既继承了其合理内核,又批判了其“唯心”外壳,因而能够对唯物辩证法的形成做出相对完整的解释。There are two basic understandings about the formation of Marx's dialectics. The first is the path of materialism, and the other is the approach of metaphysical criticism.Among them, the treatment of Hegel's dialectics constitutes the inherent difference between the two approaches. The materialist approach highlights the reversal of idealism and neglects the absorption and criticism of the rational core of Hegel's dialectics, so it is difficult to explain the complete construction of materialist dialectics. The process of Marx's metaphysical critique of political economy is based on new materialism. By fully absorbing Hegel's dialectics to criticize this metaphysics, Marx inherits its rational core and criticizes its "ideal"outer shell, thus enabling a relatively complete interpretation of the formation of materialist dialectics.

关 键 词：唯物主义 辩证法 政治经济学批判 形而上学批判 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]