检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺俊[1] 严学文 曹苏[1] He Jun;Yan Xuewen;Cao Su(School of Management,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学技术大学管理学院
出 处:《统计与决策》2019年第11期143-147,共5页Statistics & Decision
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71573240)
摘 要:文章将政府公共支出分为亲贫式支出与非亲贫式支出,并将其嵌入到内生增长模型中,利用中国2011-2016年24个省份的面板数据,探讨亲贫式支出对农村减贫的影响。结果表明,亲贫式支出与农村减贫呈正相关,亲贫式支出中的各项支出均能够有效减少贫困。而且,亲贫式支出的减贫效果具有明显的地区差异化,亲贫式支出中的各项支出的减贫效果也具有明显的地区差异化。This paper divides government public expenditure into pro-poor and non-pro-poor expenditure,and firstly embeds it into the endogenous growth model. Then the paper uses panel data of 24 provinces in China from 2011 to 2016 to explore the impact of poverty alleviation expenditures and all expenditures in poverty alleviation expenditures on rural poverty. The results show that pro-poor expenditures are positively correlated with rural poverty reduction,and all expenditures in poverty alleviation expenditures can effectively reduce poverty. Moreover,the reduction effect of pro-poor expenditure has obvious regional differentiation and the poverty reduction effect of various expenditures in pro-poor spending also has obvious regional differentiation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117