检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张利民[1] Zhang Limin
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院
出 处:《行政与法》2019年第6期116-128,F0003,共14页Administration and Law
摘 要:我国民事执行权配置经历了从"审执合一"到"审执分离"的发展过程。在现有的"审执分离"模式下,民事执行权配置面临着公正和效率的双重考验,而目前针对民事执行进行的基于法院内部机构的横向探索和基于上下级法院的纵向探索尚不能完全解决"审执分离"模式下的执行问题,且其本身也存在制度逻辑矛盾、违背法律规定等问题。"立审执"一体化的制度探索是在不突破现有"审执分离"的前提下,对审判团队和执行团队进行制度功能的调和,通过采用措施前置和观念前置的理念,将可能涉及的执行"因子"渗透进立案、审判和执行的各个环节,实现审判与执行的有效恰接,以达成有效破解"执行难"问题之目的。The allocation of civil enforcement power in China has experienced the development process from "reconciliation and reconciliation" to "separation of trial and dismissal".However,under the existing "separation of trial and disengagement" mode,China’s executive power allocation model is facing the double dilemma of justice and efficiency.At present,the horizontal exploration mode based on the internal organs of the court and the vertical exploration mode based on the lower courts in China,which cannot effectively solve the implementation problems under the "trial separation"mode in China,and they also face institutional logic contradictions and violations of legal regulations.The system exploration of the "review and enforcement" integration is to reconcile and match the system functions of the trial team and the executive team without breaking through the existing "trial separation".The concept of the implementation of the"factor" may be involved in the investigation,trial and execution of all links,fully realize the effective convergence of trial and execution,so as to achieve the "difficulties in implementation" problem.The exploration experience of Jiangyin Court’s "standing trial" integration is worth learning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7