城市哲学:资本逻辑与人学视界  

The End of “Capital Logic” and the Reconstruction of “Urban People”——the Humanistic Vision in the Study of Urban Philosophy

作　　者：耿芳兵[1] Geng Fangbing(School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2019年第6期114-120,159,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“政治哲学视域中的治国理政之道”(编号:16ZZD025)阶段性成果;国家留学基金委资助项目(编号:201806360234)

摘　　要：以资本逻辑批判为主要研究路径的城市哲学抽象地表达了一种"物"的逻辑,而城市作为人类文明的产物内在地具有一种"人"的逻辑,二者的冲突导致了城市中以人的"空间感"丧失为特征的精神异化现象。城市研究之所以忽视人而抬高资本的根本原因在于研究主体的缺失。因此,有必要在拆解城市与资本密切关系的同时树立一个"城市人"形象。如何理解和诠释这个"城市人"对于理解城市社会中人的生存状态具有前提性意义。Critique of capital logic is an important path for Marxist philosophy to understand cities, but it is not the only path. Its excessive use and popularity have led to the simplification of urban research paths.Urban philosophy, which is based on the critique of capital logic, abstractly expresses the logic of "object",and the city as a product of human civilization inherently has a logic of "human". The conflict between them leads to the phenomenon of spiritual alienation which people’s "space sense" are lost in the city. The fundamental reason why urban research ignores people and raises capital is the result of lacking urban research subjects. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a "Home-urbanicus" while dismantling the close relationship between the city and capital. How to understand and interpret the "Home-urbanicus" has a premise significance for understanding the living conditions of people in urban society.

关 键 词：城市哲学 资本逻辑 批判 "城市人" 

分 类 号：F290[经济管理—国民经济] C912.81[社会学]