不同的治疗方案治疗妇产科宫颈糜烂的临床效果比较  

Comparison of Clinical Effects of Different Treatment Schemes in the Treatment of Cervical Erosion in Gynecology and Obstetrics

作　　者：陶丽平 Tao Liping(Pingdingshan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Henan Province, Pingdingshan 467000)

机构地区：[1]河南省平顶山市妇幼保健院

出　　处：《数理医药学杂志》2019年第7期990-991,共2页Journal of Mathematical Medicine

摘　　要：目的:探究射频自凝刀治疗方案及利普刀治疗方案在妇产科宫颈糜烂中的临床应用效果。方法:共选取于2017年1月份~2018年4月份在某院妇产科进行宫颈糜烂治疗的患者共128例,采用随机分组法,将患者分成对照组和观察组,每组患者各64例。给予对照组患者射频自凝刀治疗方法,给予观察组患者利普刀治疗方法。结果:不良反应发生率对比观察组相较于对照组较低,临床治疗有效率对比观察组相较于对照组较高,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:在妇产科宫颈糜烂治疗中,利普刀治疗方法治疗效果优于射频自凝刀治疗方法,有助于降低患者不良反应发生概率,疾病临床治疗效果显著。Objective: To explore the clinical effect of radiofrequency self-coagulation knife therapy and Leep knife treatment on cervical erosion of obstetrics and gynecology department. Methods: A total of 128 patients for the treatment of cervical erosion in the department of gynaecology and obstetrics of a hospital from January 2017 to April 2018 were selected and divided into control group and observation group averagely according to randomized method, with 64 in each group. The control group were given radiofrequency self-coagulation knife, and the observation group was given Leep knife. Results: The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the clinical effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, with statistical difference(P<0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of cervical erosion in obstetrics and gynecology, the therapeutic effect of Leep knife treatment is better than that of the radiofrequency self coagulation knife, which helps to reduce the incidence of adverse reaction, and the effect of the clinical treatment of the disease is remarkable.

关 键 词：宫颈糜烂 射频自凝刀 利普刀 不良反应 治疗效果 

分 类 号：R711.32[医药卫生—妇产科学]