检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王玲[1] Wang Ling(School of Foreign Languages, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, Yunnan, China)
机构地区:[1]云南大学外国语学院
出 处:《民族学刊》2019年第3期5-13,100-102,共12页Journal of Ethnology
基 金:2017年度国家社科基金艺术学项目“中国西南民族音乐舞蹈图像研究”(17EH248);2015年度国家留学基金项目“民族传统文化的跨文化比较、翻译与传播研究”(201507035007);2015年度云南省哲学社科艺术科学规划重点项目“云南民族音乐舞蹈图像文化艺术的资源保护、产业开发与国际交流研究”(A2015ZDZ001);2018年度云南省“万人计划”“云岭学者”专项;2013年度云南大学研究生优秀教材《英语跨文化交际:理论与体验》建设项目;2019年度云南大学人文社科研究国家级重大培育项目成果
摘 要:民族志探究的反思性和重新界定参与体现于当代视觉艺术运动中。当代国际艺术实践中民族志方法的利用既能通向有趣的协作类型,也易导致民族志的单纯审美化。当代艺术和媒体实践强调参与和协作,协作动态能使研究者与艺术家一起嵌入为记录和呈现协作过程的技术开发。通过线上和移动媒体的记录能为艺术家和公众提供以不同方式参与和反思的机会。当代艺术实践中使用民族志方法的主要挑战之一是要理解地方和在场如何能以不同方式缠绕和重叠。艺术与变成一套多价值跨学科方法和概念框架的民族志日益密切,分析二者的交叉有价值。批判反思在艺术和民族志中均发挥作用。艺术实践中民族志的利用新近转向跨国、跨文化、跨学科协作,跨线、跨场域、跨时空共同在场,非中心化话语,多元化参与视角、形式,以及多维度阐释,因而可能为全球艺术发展提供更大洞察力和严谨性。Ethnography has emerged as a widely employed approach in contemporary media culture,and has been accepted by people in the visual arts as a way to write about cultural practices. The reflexive negotiation of self,power,labor and participation have remained central concepts of ethnographic practices. Relationship aesthetics has identified a key ongoing tendency in contemporary arts — the application of ethnography.Drawing on case studies of recent international art projects,we need to define the intertwinement between arts and ethnography,and examine the ethnographic turn haunting contemporary arts through numerous guises from relationship aesthetics onwards. The employment of ethnographic approaches in contemporary international art practices can not only lead to interesting types of collaboration,but can also easily cause an aestheticization of ethnography. Recent art projects both borrow the conventional documentation forms and participant observation ideal of traditional ethnography,and present new representational forms of mobile media and contemporary characteristics different from it.With the development of globalization,networking, digitalization,media culture, mobile technology,virtual reality and other technologies,various utilizations of ethnographic approaches by the art world reflect the similarities among and differences between contemporary art ethnography and traditional ethnography and its new orientations and trends. In the debates surrounding the concepts of identity and place related to traditional ethnography,there is a need to rethink place as not just geography but,also look at its relationship to multiple forms of presence. The movement fromunderstanding place as a location to a space for various forms of presence is essential to both the contemporary arts and ethnographic practices. Geoethnography examines place as a concept that is experienced and imagined,and provides a productive way to think about how the arts shape,and are shaped by,localities and regions across the world.Both conte
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15