关于《本草纲目》金陵本缺笔讹字的研究  

Study on themisprints of the primary version of the Compendium of Materia Medica

作　　者：张志斌[1] 郑金生[1] ZHANG Zhibin;ZHENG Jinsheng(Institute of Basic Research In Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China)

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院中医临床基础医学研究所,北京100700

出　　处：《中华医史杂志》2019年第3期146-162,共17页Chinese Journal of Medical History

摘　　要：《本草纲目》金陵本是初刻本,最能反映李时珍的原意,备受学者们的推崇,但是就其刻工技术而言,不属上乘。刻写存在许多粗疏之处,最为明显的就是缺笔讹字过多。经笔者不完全统计,此类由缺笔导致的讹字约为376个,615频次,大致可分为缺偏旁与缺笔画2类。特将2类缺笔讹字制成4个一览表,使其不仅能对《本草纲目》研究起到警示作用,还可以对古籍研究中的同类情况,发挥启示作用。The Jinling version of the Compendium of Materia Medica was the primary version. It accurately represented the ideas of LI Shizhen, therefore it was valued by the scholars. There were many defects in misprint ( knife carving) and proofreading. The main errors were some Chinese character's strokes missing and wrong characters printed. The authors collected some statistics data andmade some statistical analysis. They found that total misprints were 376 and emerge 615 times. Those misprints can divide into two categories: lack of some parts of Chinese characters;lack of some strokes of Chinese characters. Four tables which list the misprints was made. It is helpful for scholars to examine Compendium of Materia Medica or the study of other similar ancient literatures.

关 键 词：《本草纲目》 李时珍 金陵本 

分 类 号：R281.3[医药卫生—中药学]