美国财产法中的社会义务规范探析  

On the Norms of Social Obligations in American Property Law

作　　者：王耀伟 李梦佳 WANG Yaowei;LI Mengjia(Law School, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

机构地区：[1]福州大学法学院

出　　处：《合肥工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期38-43,共6页Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(16BFX143)

摘　　要：现代社会中,财产权已不单是定纷止争、确定归属那么简单。现实中,存在许多财产权人出于承担社会义务而被限制某些权能的情况。文章通过梳理美国财产法理念的历史变迁,归纳美国财产法中社会义务规范的理论基础,将社会义务规范分为使用牺牲和权利牺牲两种类型进行分别论述。分析发现,美国财产法中的社会义务规范有利于规范社会秩序和平衡个人与社会的利益冲突。我国可尝试借鉴美国财产法中的社会义务规范以拓宽现有的征收体系和构建以宪法为中心的公益限制制度。In modern society, property rights are no longer limited to the function of disputes settlement and attribution determination. There are many situations in which property rights are restricted by social obligations. This paper explains the changes in the concept of American property law, and analyzes the theoretical basis of the norms of social obligations in American property law. The norms of social obligations are divided into two types: uses sacrifice and entitlement sacrifice. It is found that the norms of social obligations in American property law are conducive to standardizing social order and balancing the conflict of interests between individuals and society. China can try to draw experience from the norms of social obligations in American property law in order to broaden the existing expropriation system and construct a constitution-centered public welfare restriction system.

关 键 词：财产法 社会义务规范 所有权 

分 类 号：D996.2[政治法律—经济法学]