《中国文献编目规则》与RDA关于著录信息源规定的对比分析——以普通图书题名和责任说明为例  

Comparative Analysis of Chinese Bibliographical Cataloging Rules and RDA in Terms of Description Source of Information:A Case Study of “Monograph Title and Statement of Responsibility”

作　　者：辛苗[1] Xin Miao(Library of Neijiang Normal University)

机构地区：[1]内江师范学院图书馆

出　　处：《图书馆杂志》2019年第6期39-43,共5页Library Journal

摘　　要：著录信息源是文献著录时据以选取著录项目内容的来源,《中国文献编目规则》和RDA在著录信息源的规定上存在显著差异。通过对比发现,RDA对相关概念的定义更明确,对普通图书题名和责任说明的著录信息源的具体规定也更合理,值得中文编目采用或借鉴。Description source of information is the source of selecting content of the descriptive entries in document description. There is a significant difference between Chinese Bibliographical Cataloging Rules and RDA in terms of its regulations. RDA defines the related concepts more clearly and specifically, while its regulations on the description information source for monograph title and statement of responsibility also more reasonable. The author believes that Chinese cataloging should draw upon RDA, therefore.

关 键 词：《中国文献编目规则》 RDA 著录信息源 

分 类 号：G254.3[文化科学—图书馆学]