穿越的思索:广府民居研究笔记  

Reflections Arising from a Study of Folk Houses in the Canton Area

作　　者：肖旻[1] Xiao Min(the National Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Architectural History and Culture Research Centre, South China University of Technology ,Guangzhou 510641)

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学建筑历史文化研究中心亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室

出　　处：《建筑遗产》2019年第2期43-49,共7页Heritage Architecture

摘　　要：文章首先回顾了自20世纪80年代以来,中国传统民居研究在内容上从住宅类型到乡村公共建筑、聚落层面的推进,在方向上从官式建筑研究到地方性乡土建筑研究的拓展,指出这一变化体现了一种从中心性议题到边缘的扩展。文章进而认为,借鉴了方言地理学方法的传统民居区划研究,存在一个从中心地典型建筑现象的研究扩展到边缘区域建筑现象的的研究进程。文章以广府民居研究为例,借助两篇关于“屋式”的地方历史文献的解读,对探索一种更贴近历史主体的地方性知识所需要的研究方法进行反思。文章通过对单体与整体、形态与观念、形式与材料、广府与华南等系列话题的分析,指出现有理论话语在区划研究中的局限性,提出以问题线索为主导的专题性研究策略。Since the 1980s, research into Chinese traditional folk houses has seen the expansion of ancient Chinese architectural history from official building research to vernacular architecture research, embodying a kind of academic evolution from the centre to the margins. This article points out that the zoning of traditional Chinese folk houses, which draws on the method of dialect geography, features a research process that has developed from studies of the centre to those of the edge. Taking the study of folk houses in the Canton area as an example, the article uses two local historical documents on house forms to reflect on research methods, arguing for a kind of local knowledge that is closer to historical subjectivity. Through an analysis of a series of topics mentioned in the two documents, such as unit and entity, form and concept, details and materials, and Canton and South China, the article points out the limitations of the existing theoretical discourse, proposing a more flexible, open-ended approach based on specific research problems.

关 键 词：民居 方言 广府 地方性 屋式 

分 类 号：TU092.9[建筑科学] TO021