侦查环节适用认罪认罚制度的思考  

Reflection on the Application of Plea of Guilt and Penalty System in the Investigation Stage

作　　者：乔宗楼[1] QIAO Zong-lou

机构地区：[1]江苏警官学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2019年第3期81-87,共7页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：江苏省省高校哲学社会科研基金资助项目“认罪认罚从宽制度研究”(2017SJB0454);江苏省高校优势学科建设项目(PAPD);江苏省高校品牌专业建设项目(TAPP)

摘　　要：刑事诉讼涉及侦查、审查起诉、审判等多个诉讼环节,侦查环节是刑事诉讼的第一道关,犯罪嫌疑人在侦查环节的认罪认罚对于整体证据链的形成同样重要。犯罪嫌疑人的认罪认罚简化了证明程序,减轻了证明负担,但不能降低对证据的证明标准。着眼于节约司法资源的程序分流改革目标,侦查环节同样是程序分流的重要环节。值班律师对于保护犯罪嫌疑人的合法利益具有重要作用,但值班律师不是辩护律师,不应具有辩护律师的法律地位。Criminal litigation involves investigation, prosecution and trial. Investigation is the first stage of criminal litigation. The confession and punishment of criminal suspects are equally important to the formation of the whole evidence chain. Although the guilty plea of criminal suspects simplifies the proof procedure and reduces the burden of proof, it cannot lower the standard of proof. Focusing on the reform goal of saving judicial resources, the investigation stage is also an important part of procedure diversion. Although on-duty lawyers play an important role in protecting the legitimate interests of criminal suspects, on-duty lawyers are not defense lawyers, and on-duty lawyers should not have the status of defense lawyers.

关 键 词：侦查 认罪认罚 值班律师 证明标准 

分 类 号：D918.2[政治法律—法学]