检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱灼坤 翁绮贞 罗成焕 ZHU Zhuo-kun;WENG Qi-zhen;LUO Cheng-huan(Department of Neurosurgery of Dongguan People's Hospital,Dongguan 523000 China)
机构地区:[1]东莞市人民医院神经外科
出 处:《现代诊断与治疗》2019年第8期1201-1202,共2页Modern Diagnosis and Treatment
摘 要:目的脑出血应用微创颅内血肿抽吸引流术治疗的临床作用分析。方法选择本院2015年6月~2016年12月收治的脑出血患者102例,随机分成观察组和对照组各51例。对照组患者采用传统内科保守治疗,观察组患者实施微创颅内血肿抽吸引流术治疗。对比2组患者各项指标情况。结果观察组临床治疗总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者功能康复指标明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对脑出血患者采用微创颅内血肿抽吸引流术治疗能有效提高临床疗效,降低患者并发症的发生率。Objective To analyze the clinical effects of minimally invasive intracranial hematoma suction drainage in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods The hospital in June 2015~2016 year in December 102 cases of cerebral hemorrhage patients,randomly divided into observation group and control group,51 cases in each group;the control group of patients with cerebral hemorrhage with traditional conservative treatment,the observation group underwent minimally invasive drainage for the treatment of intracranial hematoma. The indexes of 2 groups of patients with cerebral hemorrhage were compared.Results The observation group in patients with cerebral hemorrhage and the clinical total efficiency of 98.04% is better than that of control group(P<0.05);the complication rate of observation group was better than the control group 3.92%(P<0.05);to observe the recovery index group compared with the control group,the observation group is superior(P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive evacuation of intracranial hematoma can effectively improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the incidence of complications in patients with cerebral hemorrhage.
关 键 词:微创颅内血肿抽吸引流术 脑出血
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62