检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王颖 毕灵云 WANG Ying;BI Ling-yun(School of Architecture and Civil Engineering,Shenyang University of Technology,Shenyang 110870,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳工业大学建筑与土木工程学院
出 处:《沈阳工业大学学报》2019年第4期457-463,共7页Journal of Shenyang University of Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51008199)
摘 要:为了对比分析实复式与空复式钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点的抗震性能,利用有限元软件ABAQUS对实复式钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点进行了模拟,并与实测试验数据进行了对比.通过建立空复式钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点模型,完成了实复式及空复式钢管混凝土梁柱节点的抗震性能对比分析.结果表明,实复式钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点的延性系数、耗能能力、强度退化和刚度退化等抗震性能指标均优于空复式钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点.In order to compare and analyse the seismic performance of column-beam joints with solid and hollow multiple concrete filled steel tubes, the column-steel beam joints with multiple concrete filled steel tube were simulated with the finite element software ABAQUS, and the simulation results were compared with the experimental data. Through establishing the model for the column-steel beam joints with hollow multiple concrete filled steel tube, the comparative analysis for the seismic performance of column-steel beam joints with solid and hollow multiple concrete filled steel tubes was completed. The results show that the seismic performance indexes of column-steel beam joints with solid multiple concrete filled steel tube, including ductile coefficient, energy dissipation capacity, intensity degradation and stiffness degradation, were better than those of column-steel beam joints with hollow multiple concrete filled steel tube.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117