我国优秀女子赛艇运动员测功仪6 km、60 min测试功率与其无氧阈功率的一致性研究  

The Consistency of Power between 6-km or 60-min Tests on Rowing Ergometer and Anaerobic Threshold in Elite Female Rowers

作　　者：资薇[1,2] ZI Wei(Henan University, Kaifeng 475000, China;Chinese Rowing Association, Beijing 100061, China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学体育学院 [2]中国赛艇协会

出　　处：《体育科学》2019年第6期83-88,共6页China Sport Science

基　　金：河南省科技厅科技发展计划项目(162400410224)

摘　　要：目的:探索赛艇测功仪6km测试功率(P6)及60min测试功率(P60)和无氧阈功率(P4)之间的一致性,以便在6km和60min两种测试方法中寻求能替代无氧阈测试的方法。方法:86名我国优秀女子赛艇运动员作为测试对象,收集整理其2009年1月-2018年1月期间赛艇测功仪6km和60min的测试结果,以及同时进行的三级递增负荷测试数据,对P6和P4、P60和P4之间进行配对t检验、线性回归分析(Pearson相关)、组内相关系数以及一致性分析(Bland-Altman法)。结果:P6明显高于P4(P<0.01),P60和P4无明显差异(P>0.05),P6和P4、P60和P4之间存在高度相关,ICC检验认为,P6和P4、P60和P4之间均具有良好的一致性,但Bland-Altman检验认为,仅P60和P4之间具有较好的一致性。结论:P60和P4之间不存在明显差异,具有高度相关和较好的一致性,因此,采用赛艇测功仪60min测试所得结果能代表三级递增负荷测试所得无氧阈功率。Objective: To investigate the consistency of power between 6-km test (P6) or 60-min test (P60) on rowing ergometer and anaerobic threshold (P4). Methods: The power data of P6, P60 and P4 were collected from 86 female elite rowers from January 2009 to January 2018. The paired T test, Pearson test, ICC and Bland-Altman test were used to do data analysis. Results: The power of P6 was significantly higher than P4 (P<0.01), but no significant difference was found between P60 and P4 (P>0.05). The power of P6 was highly related with P4, and the relationship between P60 and P4 was significantly as well. The ICC test showed a good consistency between P6 & P4, as well as P60 & P4. However, the Bland-Altman test showed only P60 & P4 have a good consistency. Conclusion: The power of P60 was highly related with P4 and the data was good consistency between these two tests. Thus, the 60- min test on rowing ergometer can be considered as an alternative method to measure athletes’ power in replacing the anaerobic threshold test.

关 键 词：赛艇 测功仪 6km测试 60min测试 三级测试 一致性 

分 类 号：G804.2[文化科学—运动人体科学]