检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵学昌[1,2] 齐艳苓 ZHAO Xuechang;QI Yanling
机构地区:[1]天津职业大学公共管理学院 [2]天津德欣律师事务所 [3]天津理工大学马克思主义学院
出 处:《理论与现代化》2019年第4期87-95,共9页Theory and Modernization
摘 要:关于送养人在养老机构服务合同中的法律地位,实践中形成了总括式与区分式两种安排方式,并具有特定的法律和事实根据。送养人的法定义务来源于其未委托给机构的赡养(抚养、监护或救助)义务和诚实信用原则的要求,其大部分权利来源于入住老年人权利的让与。基于代理人、付款义务人等角色的安排皆不能涵盖或说明送养人的法律地位,基于送养人法律义务的相对独立性,未来在养老机构服务合同立法中,送养人法律地位的特定化应属必然。送养人的法律地位的特定化也将彰显养老机构服务合同具有三方主体的特殊性。There are two kinds of arrangements about the legal status of the family member in contract of institutional service for the elderly. The legal obligation of the family member in contract of institutional service for the elderly comes from the maintenance obligations and the principle of honesty and credit. The legal obligations of the family member include first contractual obligations, contractual obligations, post-contractual obligations, impairment obligations, and maintenance obligations not entrusted to the institution. In the service contract for the aged care institution, the family member has an independent legal obligation, and also has the same contractual rights, and has an independent legal status. The independence of the legal status indicates that the service contract for the aged care institution has at least the particularity of the tripartite body and the distinctive feature of being a new type of service contract.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222