丹尼特多重草稿模型的合理性论证  

On the Rationality of Dennett’s Multiple-draft Model

作　　者：董佳蓉[1] 李娜[1] DONG Jia-rong;LI Na(School of Philosophy and Society, Shanxi University, Taiyuan Shanxi, 030006)

机构地区：[1]山西大学哲学社会学学院

出　　处：《山西大同大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期48-52,共5页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：丹尼特通过批判笛卡尔剧场对主观时间的处理,提出了自己的替代模型:多重草稿模型。沿着丹尼特的思路,本文比较了两种模型的主要特征,展示了多重草稿模型如何避免了笛卡尔剧场所面临的无法解决的问题,以及其合理性论证存在的质疑,认为虽然多重草稿模型的提出存在一些缺陷,但它作为一个启发性模型对心灵哲学的研究有着深远的意义。By criticizing the treatment of subjective time in Descartes Theater,Dennett put forward his own alternative model:multiple draft model. Following Dennett’s thought,this paper compares the main features of the two models,and shows how the multiple-draft model avoids the unsolvable problems faced by the Cartesian Theater and the question of its rationality. Although the multiple draft model has some defects,it is of great significance to the study of philosophy of mind as an enlightening model.

关 键 词：丹尼特 多重草稿模型 意识 

分 类 号：B0[哲学宗教—哲学理论]