检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵雪[1] 鲁瑾芳 宫春辉 张颜雪 ZHAO Xue;LU Jin-fang;GONG Chun-hui;ZHANG Yan-xue(College of Humanities, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China;The Secondary Specialized School of Shaoxing, Shaoxing 312000, China;Media College, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Ji’nan 250014, China;Ireader Company, Beijing 100024, China)
机构地区:[1]中国传媒大学人文学院,北京100024 [2]绍兴市中等专业学校,浙江绍兴312000 [3]山东政法学院传媒学院,山东济南250014 [4]掌阅科技,北京100024
出 处:《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》2019年第4期60-70,共11页Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
基 金:国家社科基金项目“口述历史语篇的计量语体研究”(17BYY213)
摘 要:在与日常谈话、学术论文语篇对比的基础上,对口述历史语篇的多维度分析表明,可以提取的基本维度有四个,即“人际互动与资讯传递”“个人情感的表达与对事实的客观陈述”“口语体与书面语体”“事件重构与论证阐释”。研究表明,口述历史语篇倾向于人际互动;它重在对事实的客观陈述;它是准备程度较高、经过编辑加工的言语成品,具有书面语体的倾向;它重在重构历史事件,具有叙事性。上述特征是由口述历史语篇的交际方式、交际目的以及生成环境决定的。On the basis of comparing with daily conversation and academic papers with Multidimensional Analysis, this paper extracted four basic dimensions of oral history. These four basic dimensions were as followed: interpersonal interaction vs. information transmission, expression of personal feelings vs. objective statement of the fact, oral register vs. written register, event reconstruction vs. demonstrative explanation. The study showed the results as followed: the oral history text tended to be more inter-personally interactive;focused more on objective statement of the fact;was well-prepared and processed speech product with a tendency of written register;highlighted on the reconstruction of historical events, hence with the features in narratives. These features were determined by the ways and purposes of communication, and production circumstances of the oral history text.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.222.68