罗尔斯正义原则和诺奇克资格理论的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Rawls’s Principles of Justice and Nozick’s Qualification Theory

作　　者：王培培 WANG Pei-pei(School of Politics and Administration,Tianjin Normal University,Xiqing Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学政治与行政学院

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第6期38-40,44,共4页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：在西方当代的政治哲学研究过程中,从广泛的意义来讲,各种政治价值都可以归到平等这一大的领域中。对平等的评价域不同,所得出的理论也不同,甚至相互矛盾和冲突。通过分析有代表性的政治哲学家罗尔斯“基本善”的平等和诺奇克“持有正义”的权利平等,并进而分析他们平等理论的这两个争论焦点可以看出:他们平等的基础分别是物质和权利。不管他们对平等的基础怎样进行争论,最终都是为了在选择和境遇之间进行协调,从而使人和社会都可以从这两方面的平等价值中获益。In the course of contemporary Western political philosophy research, in a broad sense, various political values can be attributed to the big field of equality. Different evaluation domains for equality have different theories and even contradictions and conflicts. By analyzing the equality of the "basic good" equality of the representative political philosopher Rawls and the equality of Nozick's "holding justice", and then it analyzes the two controversial points of their equality theory: the basis of their equality is material and rights. Regardless of what argument about the basis of equality, the ultimate goal is to coordinate between choices and circumstances so that both people and society can benefit from the equal value of these two aspects.

关 键 词：罗尔斯 诺奇克 正义、基本善 权利 

分 类 号：D095[政治法律—政治学]