检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王明科 丁碧波 WANG Ming-ke;DING Bi-bo(School of Laws,Yunnan University,Kunming Yunnan 650500,China;School of Intellectual Property Rights,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]云南大学法学院,云南昆明650500 [2]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2019年第6期97-101,共5页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
摘 要:虽然我国《商标法》第三十二条认定商标抢注行为系违法行为,但却未对商标抢注人规定相应的惩罚性法律责任。从法律解释的角度及出于利益平衡考虑,商标被抢注人的民事利益值得受到法律保护,商标被抢注人得依《民法总则》、《侵权责任法》和《商标法》的相关规定向商标抢注人就自己所遭受的商誉减损、市场机会丧失等纯粹经济损失主张侵权损害赔偿。Although Article 32 of China's Trademark Law recognizes trademark squatting as illegal, it does not stipulate corresponding punitive legal liability for trademark squatter. From the perspective of legal interpretation and for the sake of a balance of interests, the civil interests of the registered trademark owner are worthy of legal protection. The registered trademark owner may claim compensation for infringement damages against the trademark squatter for the pure economic losses such as goodwill impairment and market opportunity loss, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the General Provisions of the Civil Law, the Tort Liability Law and the Trademark Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117