优质护理对心律失常患者负性情绪的影响分析  

Analysis of the Effect of Quality Nursing on Negative Emotion in Patients with Arrhythmia

作　　者：邢英[1] 郭慧慧 金悦 陈丽 方蕊 张晓霞[1] XING Ying;GUO Hui-hui;JIN Yue;CHEN Li;FANG Rui;ZHANG Xiao-xia(China Aerospace Science and Industry Group 731 Hospital,Beijing,100074 China)

机构地区：[1]中国航天科工集团七三一医院

出　　处：《中外医疗》2019年第14期140-142,149,共4页China & Foreign Medical Treatment

摘　　要：目的观察分析优质护理对心律失常患者负性情绪的影响。方法方便选取该院2018年1—12月收治的374例心律失常患者为该次研究对象,按照是否给予患者优质护理将所有患者分为对照组(187例:常规护理)与实验组(187例:优质护理),比较两组患者护理干预效果。结果实验组患者护理干预24h、72h、1周后同期症状自评表(SCL-90)得分以及护理干预72h后左心室射血分数、心输出量等相关心功能参数均明显优于对照组,数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组患者护理干预24h、72h、1周同期Morisky依从性量表得分分别为(4.55±0.18)分、(5.02±0.21)分、(6.84±0.23)分,均高于对照组,数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组患者护理干预1周后有效率明显高于对照组(84.49%vs69.52%),数据差异有统计学意义(χ^2=5.672,P<0.05)。实验组患者对临床护理满意度高于对照组(80.22%vs98.93%),数据差异有统计学意义(χ^2=5.892,P<0.05)。结论心律失常患者优质护理干预效果明显优于常规护理。Objective To observe the influence of quality nursing on negative emotion in patients with arrhythmia. Methods Convenient select a total of 374 arrhythmia patients admitted to our hospital from January to December 2018 were enrolled in this study. All patients were divided into control group (187 cases: routine care) and experimental group (187 cases: quality care) according to whether or not patients were given quality nursing, compare the effect of nursing intervention in the two groups of patients. Results The functional parameters of the patients in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group after 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week after the symptom self-evaluation table (SCL-90) and 72 hours after the nursing intervention. The data were significantly different (P<0.05). The Morisky compliance scales of the experimental group were (4.55±0.18)points,(5.02±0.21)points, and (6.84±0.23)points, respectively, which were higher than the control group at 24 h, 72h, and 1 week, respectively, and the data were significantly different (P<0.05). The effective rate of the nursing intervention in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (84.49% vs 69.52%), and the data were significantly different (χ^2=5.672, P<0.05). The satisfaction of clinical nursing in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (80.22% vs 98.93%), and the data were significantly different (χ^2=5.892, P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of quality nursing intervention on patients with arrhythmia is significantly better than that of routine care.

关 键 词：优质护理 常规护理 心律失常 负性情绪 

分 类 号：R5[医药卫生—内科学]