略论鲁迅杂文的激进性与稳健性  

On the Radicalness and Soundness of Lu Xun’s Essays

作　　者：赵京华[1] ZHAO Jing-hua(Beijing International Studies University,School of Chinese Culture and Communication,Beijing 100024,China)

机构地区：[1]北京第二外国语学院文化与传播学院

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第4期2-12,共11页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“鲁迅东亚传播史研究”(17BZW146)

摘　　要：以1927年定居上海为界,鲁迅的杂文写作可以分为北京、上海前后两个时期。如果说,前期杂文侧重的是文明批评,即蕴含着高度政治化的总体性批判,并表现出激进色彩,那么后期杂文侧重的则是社会批评,即针对以半殖民地上海为典型的20世纪中国不完整现代性所做出的种种实践性剖析,并表现出与前期杂文不同的稳健风格。鲁迅前期杂文的文明批评对应的是其民族解放和世界主义立场,而后期的社会批评则基于阶级解放和国际主义精神。鲁迅杂文的成熟和不朽业绩表现在后期创作中,它深度融合了文明批评的总体批判和社会批评的具体剖析,从而达到了政治性和社会性高度结合的完美境界。Lu Xun’s essay writing, with his settling in Shanghai in 1927 as the boundary, can be divided into, in terms of time period, two stages: the one in Beijing and the one in Shanghai. His early essays, if we agree, are mainly around civilization criticism, i.e. inside are found politicized criticism of totality and radical color. And his later essays focus on social criticism, that is, practical analysis of incomplete modernity in China in the 20th century, at a time when Shanghai served as typical semi-colonial, and reveal a stable style different from the earlier essays. The early civilization criticism is drawn upon his standpoint of national liberation and cosmopolitanism, while the later social criticism is based on the spirit of class liberation and internationalism. The maturity and immortality of Lu Xun’s essays are manifested in his later writing, which deeply integrates the general criticism of civilization criticism and the specific analysis of social criticism, thus achieving the perfect state highly combining political and social nature. This paper takes the analysis of Lu Xun’s later essays as the priority.

关 键 词：鲁迅杂文 文明批评 社会批评 激进性 稳健性 

分 类 号：I210[文学—中国文学]