检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:仇塍迪 QIU Cheng-di(School of Law, Zhejiang Commerce and Industry University, Hangzhou 315012, China)
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学法学院
出 处:《唐山师范学院学报》2019年第4期129-135,共7页Journal of Tangshan Normal University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(18YJA820029);中共浙江省委政法委、浙江省法学会重点课题(2018NA03)
摘 要:我国法律制度层面的公民刑事参审路径仅有人民陪审员制度,且制度运行偏重参审数量而非质量。公民刑事参审路径应具备实质参与、公民权与司法权相互监督制约、司法裁判的社会公信力。从理论和域外实践的角度看,应以社会危害性为主要标准,构建分别适用轻罪案件、重罪案件和死刑案件的公民刑事参审多元化路径。The only system of people’s assessors for Chinese citizens to participate in criminal trials emphasizes the quantity rather than the quality of participation. The path for citizens to participate in criminal trials should have theoretical connotations of substantive participation, mutual supervision and restriction of civil and judicial rights, and social credibility of judicial decisions. From the perspectives of theory and extraterritorial practice, social harmfulness should be taken as the main criterion. A diversified path should be constructed for citizens to participate in criminal trials in misdemeanor, felonies and death penalty cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.81