行为、结果无价值之争的反思及选择  

The Introspection and Choice of the Conflict Between the Handlungsunwert and Erfolgsunwert

作　　者：李雪健 LI Xuejian(School of Law, Peoples Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学法学院

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期53-57,共5页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CF043)

摘　　要：行为无价值和结果无价值对立的根源理应从法哲学入手进行分析,而非从“功利主义”的道德哲学寻找根基。行为、结果无价值之争本质上是自然法指导下的个人主义和国家主义之间的抉择问题。个人和国家是对立统一而非非此即彼的关系,在风险社会的风险面前,二者可以共存。在自然法指导下,我们通过加强对“法益”概念的理解,可以缓解行为、结果无价值的矛盾,最终建立以结果无价值为根本,以行为无价值为例外的二元实质违法观。The root causes of the opposite between the Handlungsunwert and Erfolgsunwert should not be attributed to the opposite of “rule utilitarianism” and “behavioral utilitarianism” in moral philosophy. It seems more clear from the perspective of Rechtsphilosophie. The conflict between the Handlungsunwert and Erfolgsunwert is the choice of individualism and nationalism under the guidance of natural law. Individuals and nationalism isn't contradictory. In the face of risk society, there is room of coexistence. Under the guidance of natural law, we should realize the coexistence of the Handlungsunwert and Erfolgsunwert through the understanding of the concept of "legal interest". In the end, we try to establish the view that is taking the Handlungsunwert as the root and regard the Erfolgsunwert as an exception.

关 键 词：行为无价值 结果无价值 自然法 分析实证法学 风险社会 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]