重新融合羞辱理论:对掠夺性越轨的影响  

Reintegrative Shaming Theory:Impact on Predatory Derailment

作　　者：张乐宁 张晓东[2] 姚钱仕(译) Zhang Lening;Zhang Xiaodong;Yao Qianshi(University of St.Francis;San Diego State University;East China University of Political Science and Law)

机构地区：[1]美国圣弗朗西斯大学 [2]美国圣地亚哥州立大学 [3]华东政法大学

出　　处：《警学研究》2019年第3期25-38,共14页Police Science Research

摘　　要：本研究试图以控制两个变量的方式来研究布雷斯怀特的重新融合与羞辱论,这两个变量分别是父母和同辈对越轨行为的反对(羞辱)和对越轨者的宽恕(重新融合)。该研究通过结合父母和同龄人对越轨者的越轨行为表现出的反对及宽恕的形式,来把握重新融合羞辱理论。通过研究国家青少年调查收集的前两组数据发现,当其他重要变量的影响保持不变时,父母的重新融合与羞辱或同辈的重新融合与羞辱同时存在时对引发掠夺性越轨没有影响。但这两组数据却显示:当父母的宽恕和同辈的羞辱单独出现时,对于诱发掠夺性越轨都有显著消极作用。相比之下,同辈宽恕在第一组数据中对诱发掠夺性越轨表现出明显积极的作用。这些发现为布雷斯怀特的理论中的一些内容提供了支撑,但并没有支持其关键的假设,即重新融合羞辱理论是诱发掠夺性越轨的一个重要影响因素。研究成果的意义以及对未来研究的影响仍有待讨论。This research attempts to study Bres White's reintegration and shame theory by controlling two variables, they are the opposition of deviant behavior(shaming) and the forgiveness(reintegrative) of deviant people for parents and peers. It studies the reintegration and shame theory by combining the forms of opposition and forgiveness of parents and peers on the deviant behavior.Through the first two sets of data collected by the National Youth Survey, it was found that when other important variables remained, the reintegration and humiliation or reintegration and humiliation of parents and peers had no effect on the predatory derailment. But the two sets of data show that when parents' forgiveness and peer humiliation appear alone, they have a significant negative effect. In contrast, peer forgiveness showed a significant positive effect on the induced predatory derailment in the first set of data.These findings provide support for Bres White's theory, but do not supporting the key assumption that reintegration shame theory is an important factor in inducing predatory derailment. The significance of the research and the implications for future remain to be discussed.

关 键 词：羞辱 重新融合 越轨行为 

分 类 号：D917.3[政治法律—法学]