检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建华[1] Li Janhua
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2019年第4期101-109,共9页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AFX015)“权利本位论与中国民法典总则立法研究”
摘 要:民法典总则规定民事客体制度具有合理性,其关键在于民事客体制度的"公因式"体系特征,这既是深入认识民法典"提取公因式"立法技术的需要,又是正确处理繁杂的民事客体理论和应对民事立法的前提。从有体物等原始客体到履行行为再到民事权利,民事客体在民法体系中发挥着衔接作用,体现了作为总则制度所具有的体系共同性的立法技术特征。而如何在民法总则中规定民事客体制度,则是继民事客体层级理论之后必然面临的问题。The general principles of civil code stipulates civil objects, the rationality of which lies in the “common factor” system characteristics of civil objects. This is not only the need to understand the legislation technology of “extracting the common factor” in the civil code, but also the premise to deal with the complicated civil object theory and civil legislation. From the original object, such as tangible things, performance to civil rights, civil objects play a cohesive role in the civil system, which reflects the legislative technical characteristics of system commonality. Therefore, How to design the civil object system is an inevitable problem.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145