贪污贿赂案件缺席审判程序的正当性及其限度  

Justification and Limits of Absentee Trial Procedure in Corruption and Bribery Cases

作　　者：陈历文 CHEN Li-wen

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2019年第2期55-61,共7页Journal of Sichuan Police College

基　　金：湖南省研究生科研创新项目“精准扶贫视阈下湖南省基层干部腐败问题的研究”(CX2018B245)

摘　　要：贪污贿赂案件缺席审判程序的构建是否正当且其限度何在,是在应用它之前所必须回答的问题。基于词源学的分析,正当性包含合理性与合法性的含义。从目的合理性与价值合理性的关系出发,可知贪污贿赂案件缺席审判程序的构建因具有必要性和效益性而具有合理性。从法律位阶的关系考量,并结合宪法的比例原则,可知贪污贿赂案件缺席审判程序因没有违背《宪法》对权利保障的要求而具有合法性,因而是正当的。不过,结合《刑事诉讼法》的规定和《宪法》对权利保障的要求,应从适用的案由、主体、程序和救济方式等方面予以限制。Whether the construction of absentee trial procedure in the corruption and bribery cases is justified and its limits is a question that must be answered before applying it.Based on the analysis of etymology,justification includes the meaning of rationality and legitimacy.From the relationship between the rationality of purpose and the rationality of value,it can be seen that the construction of the trial procedure for absenteeism in corruption and bribery cases is reasonable because of its necessity and efficiency.From the relationship of legal hierarchy,combined with the proportionality principle of the constitution,it can be known that the absentee trial procedure for corruption and bribery cases is justified because it does not violate the requirements of constitution for the protection of rights.However,considering the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and the requirements of the Constitution for the protection of rights,restrictions should be imposed on the applicable case,subject,procedure and remedy.

关 键 词：贪污贿赂 诉讼参与权 缺席审判 正当性 限度 

分 类 号：DF636[政治法律—刑法学]